PortfoliosLab logo
UNM vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between UNM and ^GSPC is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

UNM vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unum Group (UNM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UNM:

1.96

^GSPC:

0.52

Sortino Ratio

UNM:

2.71

^GSPC:

0.85

Omega Ratio

UNM:

1.40

^GSPC:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

UNM:

3.62

^GSPC:

0.53

Martin Ratio

UNM:

12.38

^GSPC:

2.02

Ulcer Index

UNM:

4.51%

^GSPC:

4.98%

Daily Std Dev

UNM:

27.97%

^GSPC:

19.69%

Max Drawdown

UNM:

-89.38%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

UNM:

-3.94%

^GSPC:

-4.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNM achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, UNM has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 12.18%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.64% annualized return.


UNM

YTD

10.23%

1M

3.55%

6M

6.72%

1Y

54.35%

3Y*

35.26%

5Y*

45.52%

10Y*

12.18%

^GSPC

YTD

-0.67%

1M

10.48%

6M

-1.79%

1Y

10.08%

3Y*

13.71%

5Y*

14.60%

10Y*

10.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Unum Group

S&P 500

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UNM vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UNM is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UNM is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UNM is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UNM is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UNM is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UNM is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UNM vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unum Group (UNM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current UNM Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNM and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

UNM vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNM drawdown since its inception was -89.38%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNM and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

UNM vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Unum Group (UNM) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 4.58%. This indicates that UNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...